[QUOTE="BPoole96"]Link Seems the PS3 version is riddled with technical flaws. Teh Cell fails to prevail once again. 7.0 for the 360 version.? Teh both failed...
Had to get the PS3 version, I'll get it on PC someday when it's cheap. Can't wait for it to come in the mail ^_^. Pretty lame there is already character DLC on sale for 10 dollars :/
Meh I'll be judge of that...I don't trust reviewers or reviews at all.
TheGuardian03
The review has footage of the frame rate and many issues the ps3 version is having. And the good version score 7.0 which is were all the argument falls,if the game scored on 360 8.5 and 6.5 on PS3 for the fails then yeah is a deal breaker,but .5 with all the flaws the so call PS3 version has,just .5 more na both versions failed.
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="BPoole96"]Link Seems the PS3 version is riddled with technical flaws. Teh Cell fails to prevail once again. 7.0 for the 360 version.? Teh both failed... PS3 version failed even harder though.
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="BPoole96"] PS3 version failed even harder though. Blame the developer not the PS3 for it,as well for the 360 version. nah, at a certain point you cant blame the developers. its clearly harder to make games for the ps3, sounds like a sony problem
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="BPoole96"] PS3 version failed even harder though. Blame the developer not the PS3 for it,as well for the 360 version. I'm no going to play the blame game. I only play with facts, and the fact is, this game on PS3 is an inferior product.
[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="BPoole96"] PS3 version failed even harder though. Blame the developer not the PS3 for it,as well for the 360 version. nah, at a certain point you cant blame the developers. its clearly harder to make games for the ps3, sounds like a sony problem Not this late in the cycle. Developers stated the issues of harder development back in 2006 - 2008 for the PS3. If developers make the choice to develop for the system, it's on them to put out a quality product. That excuse is long overdone on a 6 year old console This is especially true for developers who have made previous games for the system like Bethesda.
[QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="BPoole96"] PS3 version failed even harder though. Blame the developer not the PS3 for it,as well for the 360 version. I'm no going to play the blame game. I only play with facts, and the fact is, this game on PS3 is an inferior product. any word on the pc version? i want to get it but god damn its $60 on steam, thats crazy
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="tormentos"] Blame the developer not the PS3 for it,as well for the 360 version. nah, at a certain point you cant blame the developers. its clearly harder to make games for the ps3, sounds like a sony problem Not this late in the cycle. Developers stated the issues of harder development back in 2006 - 2008 for the PS3. If developers make the choice to develop for the system, it's on them to put out a quality product. That excuse is long overdone on a 6 year old console This is especially true for developers who have made previous games for the system like Bethesda. why would they waste time and resources on the ps3 and risk hurting the development on the pc/360 version? sony screwed up this gen, thats on them
[QUOTE="TheGuardian03"] The review has footage of the frame rate and many issues the ps3 version is having.TheGuardian03
Once again when I go home after my work night,and play the game...I'll be the judge....
Once again there is footage that shows the problems with the PS3 version, but keep ignoring it if you want to.
No problem I will:cool:...There video's big deal I also watched other review's of the game...From Gametrailers,and Ign...And if I am not wrong they never said anything about the PS3 having problems...If anything they said both version suffer from problems...But still it's meh to me...Don't really care...
[QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="tormentos"] Blame the developer not the PS3 for it,as well for the 360 version.mems_1224
I'm no going to play the blame game. I only play with facts, and the fact is, this game on PS3 is an inferior product. any word on the pc version? i want to get it but god damn its $60 on steam, thats crazyYeah I HATE to pay 60 dollars for PC games, only a few exceptions I'll make.
Plus WFC had a 30 FPS cap, I know you could take off vsync, but then there was a lot of screan tearing, hopefully it's better this time. Some extra graphical options would be nice aswell, it was a direct port where you could just adjust resolution like Darksiders.
[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] nah, at a certain point you cant blame the developers. its clearly harder to make games for the ps3, sounds like a sony problem Not this late in the cycle. Developers stated the issues of harder development back in 2006 - 2008 for the PS3. If developers make the choice to develop for the system, it's on them to put out a quality product. That excuse is long overdone on a 6 year old console This is especially true for developers who have made previous games for the system like Bethesda. why would they waste time and resources on the ps3 and risk hurting the development on the pc/360 version? sony screwed up this gen, thats on them Then don't put out a game on the console. No developer is forced to make a PS3 version of a game. A quality product is expected by the consumer, period. The issues with development aren't new and therefore no, it's the developers problem if they decide to take on the task of maknig the game for PS3. I bet if the 360 was the weaker one no one would blame Microsoft.
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Not this late in the cycle. Developers stated the issues of harder development back in 2006 - 2008 for the PS3. If developers make the choice to develop for the system, it's on them to put out a quality product. That excuse is long overdone on a 6 year old console This is especially true for developers who have made previous games for the system like Bethesda. why would they waste time and resources on the ps3 and risk hurting the development on the pc/360 version? sony screwed up this gen, thats on them Then don't put out a game on the console. No developer is forced to make a PS3 version of a game. A quality product is expected by the consumer, period. The issues with development aren't new and therefore no, it's the developers problem if they decide to take on the task of maknig the game for PS3. I bet if the 360 was the weaker one no one would blame Microsoft. why would they not release it on ps3 and then lose out on the sales? people will still buy it. look at skyrim, people still bought the inferior ps3 version. they dont have to do anything if people are still going to buy it know they might get a broken product.
[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="tormentos"] Blame the developer not the PS3 for it,as well for the 360 version. I'm no going to play the blame game. I only play with facts, and the fact is, this game on PS3 is an inferior product. any word on the pc version? i want to get it but god damn its $60 on steam, thats crazy No word on the PC version yet but the 360 version has quite a few reviews and is sitting at an 83 on MC. I would expect it to score about the same as the 360 version since it most likely wont have hardware related flaws like the PS3. $60 is a bit steep for this, but it is Activision after all.
[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] why would they waste time and resources on the ps3 and risk hurting the development on the pc/360 version? sony screwed up this gen, thats on them Then don't put out a game on the console. No developer is forced to make a PS3 version of a game. A quality product is expected by the consumer, period. The issues with development aren't new and therefore no, it's the developers problem if they decide to take on the task of maknig the game for PS3. I bet if the 360 was the weaker one no one would blame Microsoft. why would they not release it on ps3 and then lose out on the sales? people will still buy it. look at skyrim, people still bought the inferior ps3 version. they dont have to do anything if people are still going to buy it know they might get a broken product. Sure, and they deserve to get **** for it too. Sony released the PS3 which is harder to develop for and people complained about it since launch. It's a known issue with PS3 development and the PS3 is 6 years old now. Either put up or take the blame you're going to get for putting out a bad product. It's a consumers righ to complain if the developer isn't doing their job well enough regardless of what the issue is just like developers complained about the PS3 development.
[QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="BPoole96"] I'm no going to play the blame game. I only play with facts, and the fact is, this game on PS3 is an inferior product. any word on the pc version? i want to get it but god damn its $60 on steam, thats crazy No word on the PC version yet but the 360 version has quite a few reviews and is sitting at an 83 on MC. I would expect it to score about the same as the 360 version since it most likely wont have hardware related flaws like the PS3. $60 is a bit steep for this, but it is Activision after all. yea, im bummed that it didnt have a sale or anything leading up to the release. the best deal i saw was from walmart if you buy this one on 360 you get war for cybertron for free
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Then don't put out a game on the console. No developer is forced to make a PS3 version of a game. A quality product is expected by the consumer, period. The issues with development aren't new and therefore no, it's the developers problem if they decide to take on the task of maknig the game for PS3. I bet if the 360 was the weaker one no one would blame Microsoft. why would they not release it on ps3 and then lose out on the sales? people will still buy it. look at skyrim, people still bought the inferior ps3 version. they dont have to do anything if people are still going to buy it know they might get a broken product. Sure, and they deserve to get **** for it too. Sony released the PS3 which is harder to develop for and people complained about it since launch. It's a known issue with PS3 development and the PS3 is 6 years old now. Either put up or take the blame you're going to get for putting out a bad product. It's a consumers righ to complain if the developer isn't doing their job well enough regardless of what the issue is just like developers complained about the PS3 development.they have to release all versions at the same time. if the ps3 is harder to develop for they probably do what they can in the time allowed and hope they can fix it later with a patch. it isn't their fault sony released a platform that isn't easy to develop multiplats on. you cant blame every developer out there when its a pattern of inferior versions on the ps3.
I guess the reviewer wasn't a fan. It got a 8.5 on IGN and lots of praise in their review. Oh well, I guess fans will probably like it no matter what, it seems to cater to them.
[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] why would they not release it on ps3 and then lose out on the sales? people will still buy it. look at skyrim, people still bought the inferior ps3 version. they dont have to do anything if people are still going to buy it know they might get a broken product. Sure, and they deserve to get **** for it too. Sony released the PS3 which is harder to develop for and people complained about it since launch. It's a known issue with PS3 development and the PS3 is 6 years old now. Either put up or take the blame you're going to get for putting out a bad product. It's a consumers righ to complain if the developer isn't doing their job well enough regardless of what the issue is just like developers complained about the PS3 development.they have to release all versions at the same time. if the ps3 is harder to develop for they probably do what they can in the time allowed and hope they can fix it later with a patch. it isn't their fault sony released a platform that isn't easy to develop multiplats on. you cant blame every developer out there when its a pattern of inferior versions on the ps3. Not ever developer releases inferior multiplats on the PS3. As I said before developers can do what they want for whatever reason to want. When they put out a **** product consumers will and should complain. They don't have to release anything for any particular system so, money is obvious worth the complaining. Sony isn't 100% to blame on a situation where a conscience choice is made regardless of how many times you bring up development issues. This isn't newly released system development.
[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] Sure, and they deserve to get **** for it too. Sony released the PS3 which is harder to develop for and people complained about it since launch. It's a known issue with PS3 development and the PS3 is 6 years old now. Either put up or take the blame you're going to get for putting out a bad product. It's a consumers righ to complain if the developer isn't doing their job well enough regardless of what the issue is just like developers complained about the PS3 development.FlamesOfGrey
they have to release all versions at the same time. if the ps3 is harder to develop for they probably do what they can in the time allowed and hope they can fix it later with a patch. it isn't their fault sony released a platform that isn't easy to develop multiplats on. you cant blame every developer out there when its a pattern of inferior versions on the ps3. Not ever developer releases inferior multiplats on the PS3. As I said before developers can do what they want for whatever reason to want. When they put out a **** product consumers will and should complain. They don't have to release anything for any particular system so, money is obvious worth the complaining. Sony isn't 100% to blame on a situation where a conscience choice is made regardless of how many times you bring up development issues. This isn't newly released system development.
no reasoning with him he hates the ps3 and wants to see it fail
The majority of posts in this thread really makes me think the average age here can't be above 15.
I know you guys are trying to troll but using medicore games in the first place is a rather sub par attempt.
BPoole96
7.0 is mediocre :? Some of my favorite games this gen have scored 7-7.5 A game can have its flaws and still be incredibly enjoyable, casual gamers tend to pay too much attention to scores rather than looking up facts and gameplay videos to make decisions themselves. I personally like the idea of having a more fast paced third person version of capture the flag and combining my two favorite things from combined arms games into one, the scientist class gets low HP but has a sniper rifle and can turn into a jet. Considering how much I enjoyed the first game I'm tempted to buy the PC version since the game is, after all, a shooter, even though the first one didn't have the best PC support.
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="mems_1224"]they have to release all versions at the same time. if the ps3 is harder to develop for they probably do what they can in the time allowed and hope they can fix it later with a patch. it isn't their fault sony released a platform that isn't easy to develop multiplats on. you cant blame every developer out there when its a pattern of inferior versions on the ps3.platniumgamer
Not ever developer releases inferior multiplats on the PS3. As I said before developers can do what they want for whatever reason to want. When they put out a **** product consumers will and should complain. They don't have to release anything for any particular system so, money is obvious worth the complaining. Sony isn't 100% to blame on a situation where a conscience choice is made regardless of how many times you bring up development issues. This isn't newly released system development.
no reasoning with him he hates the ps3 and wants to see it fail
Log in to comment